AVIARA PARKWAY FARMS, INC. v. AGROPECUARIA LA FINCA

“Service of process on Defendants’ attorneys was improper, and to the extent that Plaintiffs’ brief asks the court to authorize service on Defendants’ attorneys under Rule 4.1, that request is unsupported by case law authority and is denied.2 In order to proceed, Plaintiffs must effect proper service on the Farmers and GC. The court recognizes Plaintiffs’ frustration with being forced to serve parties it believes have acted in concert with parties to the original case, but allowing circumvention of proper service here would necessitate assuming the correctness of the facts alleged in Plaintiffs’ motion for contempt. The court cannot do so. The motion to quash service is GRANTED.”

AVIARA PARKWAY FARMS, INC. v. AGROPECUARIA LA FINCA Case No. 8-cv-2301-JM-BLM.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020120327A23/AVIARA%20PARKWAY%20FARMS,%20INC.%20v.%20AGROPECUARIA%20LA%20FINCA
Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under World Events

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s